The Studio is an internal, non-commercial execution environment where filed system architectures that already exist in filed intellectual property are formally structured, exercised, and evaluated before they are exposed to publication, funding, or commercialization pressures.
Work inside it focuses on mathematical and computational intelligence frameworks, multimodal communication systems, simulation-based training and evaluation platforms, and domain-specific systems such as robotics and clinical technologies. These architectures are subjected to disciplined definition, simulation, and governed review to determine whether they are internally coherent and technically survivable.
Systems that fail under evaluation are corrected or terminated within the Studio. Systems that remain coherent may be deemed eligible to exit it under separate governance.
DLEV Studio
A Governed Studio Interface for Architected Intelligence Systems
About the Studio
DLEV Studio is not a lab, an incubator, or a publishing venue.
It is a governed execution boundary.
Work within the Studio focuses on structured system design, simulation, and supervised evaluation of early-stage architectures. Projects are decomposed into explicit components, exercised in controlled environments, and reviewed against architectural intent rather than market momentum or publication incentives.
It supports collaboration with academic, clinical, and institutional partners, but participation is scoped, supervised, and governed. Creative work, research activity, and translational efforts are permitted only insofar as they serve system execution and validation. Any subsequent publication, grant activity, or commercial use occurs entirely outside it and under separate governance.
Its primary function is clarity: systems either demonstrate internal coherence under constraint—or they are decisively rejected before propagation beyond the Studio boundary.
IP Architecture
A structured portfolio of filed provisional intellectual property organized as a tiered system architecture is maintained in the Studio. Each tier defines a distinct layer of abstraction and responsibility, allowing complex systems to be evaluated, extended, or terminated without contaminating downstream layers.
Its role is to establish coherence across these tiers before any system is exposed to external institutional, funding, or commercial pressures.
See the IP Architecture page for additional information.
Filed Systems
The Studio maintains and evaluates filed provisional system architectures representing distinct applied problem domains. These filed systems are described at a conceptual level to clarify architectural intent without disclosing implementation details or commercialization pathways.
See the Filed Systems page for additional information.
Phase-1 Executions
A small number of Phase-1 systems under governed simulation and evaluation is currently executing within the Studio. Phase-1 execution exists to test architectural hypotheses through disciplined implementation, iteration, and measurement within strictly bounded, non-clinical, non-commercial simulation environments.
Systems that fail to demonstrate validity at this stage are corrected or abandoned. Any downstream translation, institutional adoption, or commercialization—if any—occurs only outside its boundary under separate governance.
Learn more about Phase-1 Executions for additional information.
Research & Scholarly Foundations
The system architectures evaluated within the Studio operate in problem domains that have been the subject of sustained scholarly inquiry across medicine, engineering, ethics, and the humanities. Related scholarly work provides contextual grounding and independent academic discourse but does not constitute inventorship, contribution, or reduction to practice of any filed system architecture.
See the Research & Scholarly Foundations page for additional information.
Execution Modes
Filed system architectures are evaluated within the Studio through defined execution modes that govern how work is structured, exercised, reviewed, and either advanced or terminated.
These modes describe internal evaluation mechanisms only and are distinct from development stages, collaboration pathways, or commercialization activity.
See the Execution Modes page for additional information.
Interpretive Works
In parallel with formal system evaluation, the Studio maintains an adjacent interpretive practice examining human dignity, agency, and responsibility under conditions of institutional and technological constraint. These works are independent scholarly and artistic artifacts and do not operate within the Studio’s execution, evaluation, or intellectual property framework.
See the Interpretive Works page for additional information.
Scientific Advisory Oversight
The Studio maintains an independent Scientific Advisory Board that provides non-binding guidance on scientific validity, translational boundaries, and governance posture across systems evaluated within it.
The Advisory Board operates strictly in an oversight and advisory capacity. It does not participate in system execution, authorship, commercialization, intellectual property ownership, or institutional representation. Advisory input is scoped, time-bounded, and structured to preserve independence, rigor, and boundary integrity.
See the Scientific Advisory Board page for additional information.
Contact
© 2026 Grasso & Co., LLC. All rights reserved.
DLEV Studio is an internal, non-commercial execution and evaluation initiative of Grasso & Co., LLC.
This site is informational only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation, or agreement.
For institutional, legal, or administrative correspondence related to DLEV Studio, please use the Contact page.